2026 Voting Guide

Sierra County Democrats • November 3 General Election

Sierra County deserves leaders who show up for rural communities, defend our rights, and fight for affordable health care, strong public schools, and a government accountable to the people.

Below are candidate recommendations for Sierra County voters and our guide to California’s statewide propositions.

Need to register or return your ballot? Visit our Register & Vote page.

Vote Mike McGuire for Congress

U.S. House of Representatives — District 1

We support Mike McGuire for Congress.

Rural Northern California needs a strong voice in Washington. McGuire’s campaign priorities include keeping rural hospitals open, strengthening wildfire protection, expanding broadband, lowering costs for working families, and protecting voting and reproductive rights.

He is running to represent California’s 1st Congressional District, which includes Sierra County, and is endorsed by the California Democratic Party.

We support his commitment to investing in rural communities and defending our democracy.

Meet Mike McGuire • Read his priorities • Volunteer with his campaign

Vote Dianna James for State Assembly

California State Assembly — District 1

We support Dianna Margaret James for State Assembly.

James is the Democratic candidate for Assembly District 1, which includes Sierra County, and is endorsed by the California Democratic Party.

Our communities deserve a Democratic voice in Sacramento and a representative who will listen to rural residents. Learn more about James and connect with her campaign below.

Visit Dianna James’s campaign website.

Democratic Candidate Voting Guide

The following candidates are endorsed by the California Democratic Party for offices relevant to Sierra County voters.

Office Recommended Candidate
U.S. Representative, District 1 Mike McGuire
State Assembly, District 1 Dianna Margaret James
Governor Xavier Becerra
Lieutenant Governor Fiona Ma
Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber
Controller Malia M. Cohen
Treasurer Eleni Kounalakis
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Insurance Commissioner Ben Allen
Board of Equalization, District 1 Nelson Esparza
Superintendent of Public Instruction Richard Barrera

Superintendent of Public Instruction is a nonpartisan office. Richard Barrera is the California Democratic Party’s endorsed candidate.

Explore the California Democratic Party’s voter guide.

For local contests and judicial offices, review the information included with your ballot and the Sierra County voter information materials. Local contests vary by residence.

Proposition Recommendations at a Glance

Our proposition recommendations prioritize accessible voting, strong public services, affordable housing, and accountable government.

We follow the League of Women Voters of California’s recommendations, with one difference: we recommend Yes on Proposition 40; the League is neutral.

Proposition Subject Recommendation
1 Affordable housing and veterans’ home loans YES
2 California’s rainy-day fund YES
3 Continue existing taxes on high incomes YES
4 Allow public campaign financing YES
5 Reform statewide recall elections YES
37 Loans for buyers of newly built homes NO
38 Borrowing for immunology research NO
39 New voter identification requirements NO
40 One-time billionaire wealth tax YES
41 Restrictions on new tax revenue and spending NO
42 Ban certain new state taxes on personal property NO
43 Higher approval threshold for voter-initiated local taxes NO
44 Mandatory spending ratio for community clinics NO
45 Changes to environmental review NO

Understanding the Propositions

YES on Proposition 1 — Affordable Housing and Veterans’ Home Loans

Authorizes $10 billion in bonds for affordable housing and homeownership programs, plus $1.25 billion for veterans’ home loans. We support expanding housing opportunities, while recognizing that bonds create long-term repayment obligations.

Official Proposition 1 information

YES on Proposition 2 — A Stronger Rainy-Day Fund

Allows California to build larger budget reserves during prosperous years. We support preparing for downturns so schools and essential services are less vulnerable to sudden cuts.

Official Proposition 2 information

YES on Proposition 3 — Protect Funding for Schools and Health Care

Makes existing higher income-tax rates on high earners permanent instead of allowing them to expire in 2031. It maintains current rates rather than increasing them today. We support preserving revenue for education and other essential services.

Official Proposition 3 information

YES on Proposition 4 — Give Everyday Voters More Influence

Allows state and local governments to establish public campaign-financing programs, subject to safeguards. It does not create or fund a program by itself. We support giving candidates more ways to compete without depending on wealthy donors.

Official Proposition 4 information

YES on Proposition 5 — Reform Statewide Recall Elections

Removes the replacement-candidate question from statewide recall ballots. Vacancies would be filled through procedures that depend on the office and timing. We support ending a process that can select a replacement with only a small share of the vote.

Official Proposition 5 information

NO on Proposition 37 — Homeownership Needs More Than Another Loan

Creates a loan program for qualifying middle-income buyers of newly built or converted homes. We share the goal of making homeownership attainable, but another monthly loan payment does not necessarily make a home affordable. Important financing terms would be determined after passage.

Official Proposition 37 information

NO on Proposition 38 — Avoid Decades of Research Debt

Authorizes $8.4 billion in bonds for immunology research. We support medical research, but oppose committing public funds to decades of debt for a narrowly designated field while other needs compete for funding.

Official Proposition 38 information

NO on Proposition 39 — Protect Access to the Ballot

Adds government-issued identification requirements for voting in person and identification-number requirements for mail ballots. We oppose additional barriers that could prevent eligible citizens from having their votes counted.

Official Proposition 39 information

YES on Proposition 40 — Ask Billionaires to Help Protect Health Care

Imposes a one-time tax on billionaire wealth, with revenue directed primarily to health care. We support asking those with extraordinary resources to help meet urgent public needs.

The Legislative Analyst estimates temporary revenue of tens of billions of dollars, while also identifying possible ongoing income-tax losses. This is temporary funding, not a complete solution to long-term health care financing.

The League is neutral on Proposition 40, weighing potential benefits against concerns about revenue stability and the measure’s design. Our recommendation is Yes.

Official Proposition 40 information

NO on Proposition 41 — Preserve Options for Funding Public Priorities

Restricts new state taxes that exclude revenue from the constitutional spending limit and adds special-tax audit requirements. We support oversight, but oppose restrictions that could limit California’s ability to fund services and respond to changing needs.

Official Proposition 41 information

NO on Proposition 42 — Keep Future Tax Decisions Open

Constitutionally prohibits certain new taxes on personal property, including financial assets, and certain retroactive taxes. We oppose broadly locking away future revenue options regardless of the circumstances California may face.

Official Proposition 42 information

NO on Proposition 43 — Let Communities Decide

Requires two-thirds approval for special local taxes proposed through voter initiatives. We oppose giving a minority the power to block funding supported by most voters.

Official Proposition 43 information

NO on Proposition 44 — Protect Community Health Clinics

Requires affected nonprofit community clinics to spend at least 90% of revenue on program services or face penalties. We oppose a rigid spending rule that could undermine clinic operations and access to care.

Official Proposition 44 information

NO on Proposition 45 — Protect Environmental Review and Public Input

Changes environmental review and court procedures for designated projects, including tighter deadlines and narrower legal review. We support needed housing and infrastructure, but oppose reducing meaningful public participation and environmental oversight.

Official Proposition 45 information

Compare Voter Guides

Read the proposals, compare recommendations, and decide what best reflects your priorities.

Make Your Vote Count

Election Day is November 3. Check your registration, sign your ballot envelope, and return your ballot on time.

Find registration information and Sierra County ballot-return locations.

Stand up for our communities. Defend our rights. Vote.